Federal finances: Capital features tax, extra could goal high-income earners

Article content material

We’ve a date. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland will ship Canada’s federal finances plan on March 28, giving us lower than two weeks to invest about what could — or could not — be included therein, which additionally means time is working out to do any important planning earlier than any potential tax adjustments.

Article content material

Nobody is aware of with any certainty what will likely be within the upcoming finances, however we will glean some perception on its potential themes from the 226-page pre-budget Report of the Standing Committee on Finance issued final week, which contained 230 separate suggestions for tax adjustments and spending.

Article content material

Among the many proposals, the next advice could set the tone: “Undertake a public evaluate to establish federal tax expenditures, tax loopholes and different tax avoidance mechanisms that significantly profit high-income people, rich people and huge companies and make suggestions to eradicate or restrict them.”

With that ominous theme in thoughts, listed here are some potential tax adjustments that would goal higher-income Canadians, together with some potential planning ideas.

Article content material

Prime tax bracket

The highest federal tax charge of 33 per cent presently kicks in at an earnings of greater than $235,675 for 2023, which is a 6.3 per cent bump within the threshold over 2022 because of the excessive inflation we’ve been experiencing over the previous yr. The NDP’s pre-election platform hoped to extend the highest charge by two share factors to 35 per cent. If enacted, this might carry the highest mixed marginal tax charge, as soon as provincial tax is factored in, to roughly 56 per cent in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia, and to 57 per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador.

An analogous proposal to bump up the highest charge for the very best earnings earners was not too long ago included in United States President Joe Biden’s finances announcement earlier this month. He known as for a high federal earnings tax charge of 39.6 per cent, up from 37 per cent, for taxpayers incomes greater than US$400,000.

Article content material

Article content material

Surplus strips

The federal government could resolve to close down a well-liked personal company tax-planning association that some refined taxpayers have been using to distribute company surplus (primarily, retained earnings for tax functions) from their company at capital features charges, reasonably than on the larger charges for Canadian dividends, or through the cost of a wage or bonus.

The Canada Income Company has beforehand tried to problem surplus strip transactions, however the courts have usually held that any such planning is appropriate, and doesn’t violate the final anti-avoidance rule, because the Revenue Tax Act doesn’t comprise a normal coverage requiring shareholders to take away their surplus through a dividend reasonably than a capital acquire.

Article content material

The federal government tried to close down any such planning as a part of its personal company tax reforms in 2017, however these proposals have been in the end deserted after important public criticism.

Different minimal tax

Final yr’s federal finances famous that “some high-income Canadians nonetheless pay comparatively little in private earnings tax as a share of their earnings.” To deal with this, the federal government introduced a proper evaluate of the choice minimal tax (AMT), the outcomes of which have been initially supposed to come back out in final fall’s financial replace. As an alternative, the federal government acknowledged {that a} “detailed proposal and path for implementation” can be launched within the upcoming finances.

After all, we have already got a federal AMT at a 15-per-cent charge. The main the explanation why some high-income Canadians pay low efficient charges of tax has nothing to do with nefarious tax planning. For probably the most half, high-income earners are doing nothing greater than claiming registered retirement financial savings plan deductions, charitable donations and dividend tax credit, and incomes half-taxable capital features.

Article content material

South of the border, Biden’s current finances included a proposal to introduce a brand new 25-per-cent minimal tax on people whose internet value is greater than US$100 million. This new tax can be completely different, in that it might be imposed on each earnings and unrealized capital features for the wealthiest 0.01 per cent.

Capital features inclusion charge

Lastly, no dialogue of potential finances adjustments can be full with out at the least referring to the capital features inclusion charge. Presently set at 50 per cent, it’s possible you’ll recall that the NDP’s platform proposed a hike to 75 per cent.

In preparation for the finances discussions, Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, emeritus professor at Simon Fraser College’s Faculty of Public Coverage, simply launched a paper entitled Pathways to Reform of Capital Positive factors Taxation in Canada that considers the case for rising taxes on capital features in Canada, and the implications for the upcoming reform of the AMT.

Article content material

Kesselman reveals there’s a excessive focus of capital features amongst comparatively few taxpayers and at very excessive incomes, and means that concentrating on an elevated capital features inclusion charge, both on giant features above a sure greenback quantity or by filers with very excessive incomes, would sharply scale back the variety of affected taxpayers, “easing each administration and compliance in addition to public acceptance.”

Biden’s finances proposed an identical measure. The U.S. presently taxes lengthy‐​time period capital features and dividends at a high charge of 20 per cent federally, plus internet funding earnings tax (NIIT) of three.8 per cent. The U.S. finances proposed taxing capital features at a brand new high marginal earnings tax charge of 39.6 per cent (plus elevating the NIIT to 5 per cent) for taxpayers with greater than US$1 million of annual earnings.

Article content material

If a change have been introduced to Canada’s capital features inclusion charge, it might possible be efficient as of finances day (March 28). This implies buyers who concern a bump within the inclusion charge might take into account accelerating any planning, together with a possible rebalancing of their portfolios by taking features now, thereby locking in a 50-per-cent inclusion charge. There are additionally extra refined tax methods that would purchase you a while if you happen to’re not sure what might occur to the inclusion charge on finances day.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. [email protected].

_____________________________________________________________

Should you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.

_____________________________________________________________